Five years after the blackout, experts warn it could happen again
MARK WILLIAMS
Associated Press
August 14, 2008
Original article
The ABC News take on the anniversary was a little more dire.
COLUMBUS, OHIO — Five years after the worst blackout in North American history, the largest power providers in the United States say the problems that turned out the lights on 50 million people have largely been resolved, but they fear that larger, systemic issues could soon lead to even bigger and more damaging outages.
Excess capacity in the system is shrinking and construction, as well as plans for new plants, has slowed as costs to build and operate them have soared.
At the same time, it is estimated that electricity use will increase 29 per cent between 2006 to 2030 - much of it driven by residential growth, according to a U.S. government report issued in June.
“I’m really not a Chicken Little player, but I worry that no one seems to be focusing in on this,” said Michael Morris, chairman, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power (AEP), which runs the nation’s largest electricity transmission system.
Print Edition - Section Front
Enlarge Image
More Report on Business Stories
TV networks ride Phelps’ golden wake
Genuity bulks up on discount retail
‘It has certainly changed the game’
Windsor’s man of steel bends to market forces
American Airlines speeds up purchase of fuel-efficient 737s
Environment? Economics? Hydro-Québec project fails grade
Go to the Report on Business section
Mr. Morris said massive outages this year in South Africa, which forced gold, diamond and platinum mines to stop production for five days, should serve as a warning to the United States.
Industry experts back Mr. Morris, and say there is even more resistance to building new plants due to the debate over climate change and opposition to new transmission lines.
“The level of excess capacity has shrunk down in the last few years to a level barely within the planning toleration of the industry,” said Marc Chupka, a principal with the Brattle Group, an energy consultant.
The blackout five years ago today shut off power to vast swaths of the Northeast and Midwest for as much as four days. Rolling blackouts continued in Ontario for a week.
Hundreds of thousands of people lost access to tap water for days in Ohio and the mayor of Cleveland accused shop owners of gouging people in need of drinking water.
Millions of New Yorkers, with subways shut down and office towers darkened, left the city on foot.
A U.S.-Canadian government task force largely blamed Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy Corp. for allowing a local power failure near Cleveland to cascade to the East Coast and into Canada. Industry experts say changes have been made to protect against a similar outage that caused as much as $10-billion (U.S.) in damages to the U.S. economy.
But Mr. Morris fears that in 10 to 20 years there may be greater blackouts as demand surpasses supply. “Just think of the economic hardship that would render,” he said.
Rick Sergel, president of the North American Electric Reliability Corp. of Princeton, N.J., the agency that oversees the nation’s power grid, agrees with Mr. Morris.
“We’re to the point where we need every possible resource: renewables, demand response and energy efficiency, nuclear, clean coal - you name it, we need it,” he said. “And we especially need the transmission lines that will bring the power generated by these new resources to consumers.”
But even as Americans demand more power to feed flat-screen televisions, video games, surround-sound systems and appliances, there is broad opposition to infrastructure that experts say is needed, and the costs are only going up.
Construction of coal-fired generating plants has almost stopped and new nuclear plants are years away, if they are approved at all, said Arshad Mansoor, vice-president of power delivery and utilization for the Electric Power Research Institute. Better efficiency will only go so far, he said.
“If you don’t have generation and transmission … something has to give,” he said, and that could result in a blackout or brownout.
AEP recently announced efforts to expand the nation’s transmission system. It will partner with Duke Energy in a $1-billion proposal to build 380 kilometres of transmission lines. Similar deals have been announced in Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas and West Virginia to Maryland, some including the use of wind power.
Yet infrastructure projects take a lot of time. AEP announced a plan for a transmission line in West Virginia and Virginia in 1990 that was not finished until last year, due mostly to the regulatory approval process.
Power plants are an even bigger problem, Mr. Morris said, particularly for coal and nuclear power. In Kansas, for example, Governor Kathleen Sebelius has blocked plans for two coal-fired power plants.
In conjunction with the anniversary of the blackout, FirstEnergy announced several technological improvements and greater efforts to keep its 17,700 kilometres of high transmission lines free of trees.
A power line brushed a tree in Ohio in 2003, according to the task force report, setting off cascading outages.
The task force also blamed poorly trained grid managers, and a lack of communication among power providers. Utilities have spent millions on improvements.
“The event was a major crisis and did probably force something to happen that would have otherwise not happened,” Larry Makovich, vice-president and senior power adviser for Cambridge Energy Research Associates in Cambridge, Mass.
But Mr. Morris sees a potentially dire situation ahead, including power rationing that occurred in South Africa when that nation, on a 14-year growth spurt following the end of apartheid, virtually turned itself off. “It would ruin the economy,” Mr. Morris said.
BC_EE
August 15, 2008 | 4:20 pm1
The watch phrase to note in this article, and often repeated in any bulk electricity issue is “And we especially need the transmission lines that will bring the power generated by these new resources to consumers.”
Everyone thinks PHEV’s or more electric transportation is a groovy idea until the required transmission lines need to be built. It takes a long time to plan and construct these lines, so we can’t wait until the rolling blackouts to make up our minds. Matter of fact, at the next public hearings I’m going to start taking names from the vociferous opponents. I’m sure they would be more than cooperative to be the first to cut off their electrical service when we experience shortages.
What is missing in the present day consciousness is a knowledge of history. We enjoy the luxury of rabid environmentalism and prurient NIMBYism only because 40 years ago people with vision overbuilt the electrical system for the next 30 years. That puts us 10 years behind - give or take. If we think the next 40 is going to be like the last, we are in for a dark and cold reality check.
The electric grid does not ramp up and down like a dimmer switch on the wall. It can vary within limits, but then it collapses. There is a lot of time and energy put into trying to predict load conditions so generation and transmission can be scheduled accordingly. But here is some sobering numbers (regardless of the hokey BS the NDP and BC Hydro Labour interests spew without a clue):
- BC does import 15% of it’s energy. This is NET energy, and it doesn’t matter how much BC Hydro (BCH) generates on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis. If BCH holds back water to generate when they can sell high and buy low, it doesn’t matter. It’s not any different than the speedometer and odometer on your car. You can vary your speed up and down based on driving conditions, but a kilometer is a kilometer no matter what.
- Part of the BC Hydro LTAP (Long Term Acquisition Plan) is to develop Site C (at this time I object because I know we can do many more things before that is absolutely necessary - Site C Ought To Be Plan C). Site C is planned for 0.9 GW, or 900 MW. Within the next 2 years, Puget Sound Energy (PSE) will be needing an additional 1.0 GW and growing. So, we’ll be needing a couple of Gigs in the neighborhood; Oregon will be needing 1+ Gigs; and sure enough, California et al are going to be needing a few more Gigs. Where do you think we are going to purchase that electricity, and at what cost if all these utilities are vying for the same?
You might as well fire up every single coal fired plant in Montana right now. Oh wait, that’s right, GHG’s and all that warming stuff…
So while we fiddle around playing hackey sack, navel gazing, or holding hands around the camp fire singing Kum By Ya time has run out. Get ready for a zero-sum alternative energy and transportation future because if we need to use electricity for personal vehicles or mass transit we are going to have to take it from somewhere else. Should it be schools, a hospital or two, or how about your favorite grocery store? And, its because someone, or some small group object to a transmission line or inconveniencing a few theoretical fish.
(How many rivers and creeks do kyakers need anyway? Is every stitch of land destined to be a recreational playground for no one that can afford the fuel or food to use it?)
We’ve got to get past the tyranny of the minority. I think we’ve all turned into a bunch of metrosexual, PC mush. And if you think I sound like an ignorant throw-back, remember I’ll be taking names for the first volunteers.